Hola mi Gente,
If you haven’t already, get your behind to a theater near
you and watch Michael Moore’s latest, Where to Invade Next. I would do a
review, but I don’t want to spoil it for you. Suffice it to say that I think
you should see it and that it will remind you of why we could be a great country…
* * *
The Death of Scalia
In the Era of The Collapse of U.S. Criminal Justice System
Before I move on to the significance (or lack
thereof) of Scalia’s demise, I would like to share an anecdote. If you bear
with me a moment, I think you will be able to see the connection I am trying to
make.
Years ago, I stood in front of a judge, the future
of my life in the balance. What that judge most likely did not know about my appearance
says a lot about our criminal justice system. First, I was incarcerated though
I had not been convicted of any crime. Because I could not afford bail, I was
remanded to one
of the most notorious penal colonies in the world, Rikers Island.
The following is called “Bullpen Therapy,” by those
like me who have had to endure it every time we appeared before a court…
Before I appeared before a judge (usually late in
the afternoon), I was awakened at four in the morning. I was served breakfast
in the mess hall (I was once served oatmeal that had maggots in it) and then,
after maybe 10 minutes allotment time for eating, I was taken and put into a
cage, generously called a holding cell or bullpen, meant for 25 that contained maybe 50 people.
The sole toilet was overflowing with feces and there was no room to lie down.
After about four hours, around 8:00 AM, the names
began to be called. Once your name was called, you were shackled and put on a
bus. Once the bus was filled, you taken to the county court where your alleged crime occurred and then put in
another holding cell or bullpen, this one even more crowded than the one
before. There you waited hours. The stink of the place was nauseating enough,
but what they fed you for lunch was worse: usually slimy pieces of bologna
between slices of barely edible white bread. Greasy cups of tea or sometimes
Kool-Aid in Styrofoam cups was offered.
If you were lucky enough to see your court-appointed
attorney, it was for one or two minutes at the most. Oftentimes, they spoke to
you while walking from the door to the front of the court, sometimes never even
bothering to look at you in the eyes. You stood before the court and your
public defender, assistant district attorney, and the judge would discuss your
future as if you were not there. This would last maybe two-three minutes at the
most. Sometimes, you would go through this process and if your defender was
absent or the assistant district attorney was not prepared, you would be sent
back without even seeing a judge or getting your date adjourned.
As soon as your court appearance was over, the
court officer would escort you back into the bowels of the system where you
would wait for hours until a bus would come and take you back to Rikers Island.
The whole process I have described here could take anywhere from 20 hours or
more. The same process was repeated every
time you appeared before the court. By the time you were returned to the dorm and
the hard bunk you slept on, you would be so physically and psychologically exhausted
that you would promise yourself not to do it again. Indeed, I know of scores of
people who, rather than go through the process of a court appearance again,
would plead guilty to crimes they had not committed instead.
If you think this process was the exception rather
than the rule, imagine what I have just described happening tens of thousands
of times in courts across this nation every day. Our criminal justice system is
a conveyor belt of human bondage and has nothing to do with any high ideals of
justice of fairness. The vast majority of the people on this conveyor belt are Black
and Brown people -- mostly young men from the poorest communities in our land.
During one particular arduous Bullpen Therapy
session (what many call justice), my judge refused to adjourn my case. I had
come twice before him and due to various reasons (absent legal defender, ill-prepared
ADA, etc.) and had to be turned away. So this is what the judge did: He became
judge, defender, and prosecutor. In an instance he turned to my public defender
and instructed her on what she needed to say and do. The he became a judge
again and addressed the ADA. When the ADA demonstrated cluelessness, the judge
became the prosecutor and instructed the ADA (who was busy picking up legal
papers he had dropped on the floor) on what he had to do. Then the judge became
a judge again and set another date for my case. What was hanging in the
balance? Possibly 15 years of my life.
This is our criminal justice system. It is a system
in which the rule of law has vanished. Prosecutors stand at this assembly line
and decide whom to punish and how severely. Almost no one accused of a crime
will ever face a jury. Inconsistent and abusive policing, rampant plea
bargaining, overcrowded courtrooms, and ever more draconian sentencing have
produced a gigantic prison population, with Black and Latin@ citizens the
primary defendants and victims of crime.
What is interesting is that many years later, I was
describing this incident to a group of lawyers who thought the judge’s actions
were an example of legal genius. And this is where Scalia comes in. It is this unflinching
reverence for authority that scares me. I am sure that the same people heaping
praise on the most bigoted Supreme Court justices will no doubt do the same for
war criminal, Henry Kissinger. It is this slavish adoration of authority that
really makes, pardon the expression, my dick itch.
I am sure Scalia had no clue about the underbelly
of the system he personified or represented. I doubt very much he was aware of “Bullpen
Therapy” as I experienced it. In fact, I doubt the judge that eventually
sentenced me knew what was going on in the bowels of his own court. Well, I
come to bury Scalia, not praise him. For me, Scalia
personified the essential evil of our failed criminal justice system. I
do not wish to join in the now widespread and hypocritical praise for Antonin
Scalia, one of the worst
Supreme Court justices in living memory.
Scalia was not merely a conservative, which was bad
enough, he
was a reactionary authoritarian, whose only desire was to form and
advance a theory of justice that was outdated by 1860. Scalia was an imperceptive,
bigoted, factually knowledgeable but dogmatic thinker who had shut the world
out of his awareness long before he had come to the bench. Fortunately for the
rest of us, the world is rid of him. Scalia, for all his deep knowledge of law,
remained devoutly oblivious to the changing reality around him and to the whole
complex history of dissent from traditional ideas that had been going on since the
18th century. His was an ideology that facilitated the kind of justice that I,
and many other Blacks and Latin@s, were subjected to.
My name is Eddie and I’m in recovery from
civilization…
No comments:
Post a Comment
What say you?