Hola Everybody,
Many people are saying they’re sick of this election cycle and are so turned off, they can’t wait for it to be over. Think about that. I believe this election will create a more dangerous version of Trump. That’s what voting for the lesser of two evils does -- it creates evil.
Many people are saying they’re sick of this election cycle and are so turned off, they can’t wait for it to be over. Think about that. I believe this election will create a more dangerous version of Trump. That’s what voting for the lesser of two evils does -- it creates evil.
On another tangent, I'm so tired. I’m
not seeing the light at the end of the tunnel, my friends.
The War on Sex
Speaking of
elections, one phrase that continually pops up is “culture war.” This familiar
expression is actually part of the problem. You see, the phrase suggests there
are two sides of equal strength lined up, honoring more or less the same rules
of engagement, wanting to conquer each other.
But what is called a
“culture war” is nothing like that at all. Those who fear and hate sexuality
(erotophobes) are attacking those who appreciate or tolerate sexuality
(erotophiles). Erotophiles are not attempting to force erotophobes to live more
sexually adventurous lives. In fact, erotophiles aren’t trying to make the
erotophobes do anything they don’t want to do. However, erotophobes demand
that both sides -- everyone -- live according to their anti-sex (erotophobic)
values. For example, an erotophile might say, “If you don’t want to go to a
nude beach, don’t go, but don’t shut it down to prevent me from having that
choice.” An erotophobic response might be, “I don’t want to go to a nude beach,
and I don’t want you to have the option of going either, so it must be closed.”
In a similar way, erotophobes want to control and mitigate the sexual rights of
those they fear. For example, erotophiles might say, “If you’re against gay
marriage, don’t marry one.” Erotophobes respond by waging campaigns of hate
against the LGBTQ community.
While erotophobes
recognize there’s a huge range of opportunities for erotic stimulation,
satisfaction, and imagination, they want to deny everyone, not just themselves.
Ironically, erotophobes (like most conservatives and some liberals) claim to be the victims in
this culture war.
They say they are the
ones who are being attacked, their values undermined, and their way of life
destroyed. From their paranoiac perspective, they see so-called indecent
entertainment, changing fashions, recent court decisions, internet access, and
a range of contraceptive technologies, as an intrusion -- as being force-fed
sex. They can’t, they wail, turn on a TV, go to a mall, boot up a computer, or
even go to work without being assaulted by sexual images. Furthermore, they
claim, even when they are not being literally confronted, they are still forced
to abide others’ sexual activity next door and all over the United States -- behavior
that is immoral, disgusting, and sinful.
I have no doubt this
is true for them. However it is irrelevant to the governance of the U.S.
Nowhere in our founding documents is there mention of regulating anything
considered immoral, sinful, or disgusting. On the contrary, the United States
was founded on the idea that people should be able to choose what to do and
with whom to associate based on their personal values and ideals -- not
those of a king, feudal lord, or religious hierarchy. Nor even, as James
Madison declared, the tyrannical majority in their own town, state, or nation.
When erotophobes
demand that we eliminate entertainment, fashion, medical technology, bedroom
activity, and businesses that are in their estimation “immoral” or “sinful,”
they are calling for a dismantling of the core values our nation was founded
on. Such changes would result in governance that would bring us closer to
modern Saudi Arabia, the former Soviet Union, the Taliban in Afghanistan, and
Nazi Germany.
Historically, the
U.S. has tried to balance the rights of individuals and community
responsibility. Therefore, for example, while you enjoy the freedom of speech,
you don’t have the right to yell “fire” in a crowded theater. Another
fundamental U.S. right is that the law should address actual crime and actual
victims, and it should be drafted in ways that limit negative unintended
consequences when solving a problem (in actuality, this is not true in
practice).
Today’s culture war
seeks to disrupt that balance, and it has already succeeded in many ways.
Historically, it was against the law for someone to actually kill your cow, or
doing something makes you worried about someone killing your cow. Attempting to
criminalize abortion isn’t enough for conservatives, they also attempt to ban
over-the-counter availability of emergency contraception, saying such
availability would “encourage promiscuity.” Progressives respond with
scientific data that clearly shows it won’t, and in that way, one more battle
is joined. Erotophobes respond that (as is usual) they have no data, they have
“concerns” and “feelings,” which are now considered seriously in public
policy debates.
Although our country
makes cars safer in case of accidents, has school athletes wear helmets in case
they fall awkwardly, and establishes poison control centers in case toddlers
get into cleaning supplies, these sexual jihadists don’t want to reduce
the consequences of unauthorized, unprotected, or unfortunate sex. They say
that doing so encourages bad sexual choices. That’s like saying seat belts
encourage dangerous driving and poison centers encourage sloppy parenting
practices.
Forget that children
who are taught abstinence-only have as much sex -- only they use condoms less often. Erotophobes have manipulated the public into fighting sexual
expression, not sexual ignorance or poor sexual decision-making.
Let’s be clear, a
large part of the culture wars is really about the pathological need to control
sex. Erotophobes fear sex. They fear sexual expression, sexual exploration,
sexual arrangements, sexual privacy, sexual choice, sexual entertainment,
sexual health and sexual pleasure. They want you to fear it as well.
Today’s conservative/ fundamentalist political movements (and some
progressives, I might add) present a horrifically distorted picture of
sexuality. It’s a narrative of danger and fear; a narrative of evil and sin
and, therefore, of self-destructiveness. While erotophobes typically describe
their fear in socially acceptable terms (i.e., “protecting children,”
“defending marriage”), what they really fear is sexuality as they understand
it. Actually, this is the same type of fear that compel people who call
themselves progressive, to vote for candidates who value repressive social
policies.
The outcome of these
battles will determine how our children will live for decades to come. It will
determine what books they will be allowed to read, what they will be taught to
fear, what they know about their bodies, and how much control they will have
over their own fertility.
Millions of people in the U.S.
are afraid of sex. Some admit it, some don’t. Millions more hate sex, and some
have declared war on it. The pluralism of the United States is despised by
fundamentalists around the world -- including those right here on our soil. If
you’re interested in sex, you’re part of this war whether you like it or not.
If you watch TV, use a sex toy, go to the movies, need an abortion, enjoy the occasional
dirty online chat, want a physician trained in sexual medicine, or have a child
in school, the guns of the culture war and the war on sex will be pointed at
you.
It is imperative that
we begin asking the right questions, right now, because the answers will
matter.
My name is Eddie and
I’m in recovery from civilization…
No comments:
Post a Comment
What say you?