Hola mi Gente,
I’ve been accused of suffering from “Hillary
Derangement.” I assume that to mean that I suffer from an unreasonable and
unhinged hatred of Hillary Clinton. I got this because I cited (with
documentation) some key policy areas in which Trump is to the left of Hillary. What’s that? You
shouldn’t be surprised. Hillary has a long history of corporate-friendly and
right wing policy stances. If you doubt me, think of her long and recent
history advocating for mass incarceration and her ties to the private prison industry.
But don’t take my word for it, you can find out more here
and here.
I will submit that Hillary derangement
Syndrome exists. Hillary Derangement Syndrome is the unreasonable belief that
voting for Hillary will result in different outcomes than the neoliberal/
neoconservative outcomes she has produced throughout her career. Hillary
Derangement Syndrome is the belief that committing the same actions (i.e., voting
conservative) will produce different results.
I’m reposting the following because it
reminds me a lot of the Clintons and Trump.
* * *
The Mini Me
and
the Creation of the Personal Novela
Human beings are driven by a core wound,
this kind of madness that something’s missing. The more conscious they get, the
more desperate that becomes...
-- Saniel Bonder
In
Shakespeare's play, Othello, the protagonist and his young Venetian wife are
deeply in love. Othello is a noble and simple-hearted soldier who trusts those
around him. Desdemona, his devoted wife, loves him deeply and hangs on his
every word. It is Iago, Othello's advisor and apparent friend, who plays one
character against another, creating an atmosphere of separation and distrust.
He whispers doubts into Othello's ear, inciting in him a violent jealousy that
ultimately leads to a senseless tragedy.
We
are all Othello's at heart -- open, trusting wanting to see the best in each
other -- and we are seduced and driven to insane action by our own invisible
Iagos. Our Iago is a state of mind; he cannot be seen, he lives in the shadows.
Yet his work can be seen everywhere. Iago whispers to us both from within and
through other people: it is the voice of a collective conditioning.
Our
Iagos are like the “mini me” from the Austin Powers movies -- a smaller,
angrier, and spiteful version of ourselves. A tragically funny alter-ego. Most
of us live with a painful sense of separation from others, a sense of something
missing, and a deep experience of limitation, fear, and desire -- we experience
ourselves as small. As a result, we engage in a flurry of activity to avoid the
objects of our fear and obtain the objects of our craving.
This
is best exemplified in the current electoral cycle. This is the dance of fear-based
living and, although widely perceived as normal, it fuels an endless drama of
struggle. It's the main character in our personal novela -- like the
over-the-top Spanish-language soap operas my mother watches. And no matter how
hard we try, the poison seeps through the cracks in our armor, manifesting as
disease, conflict, and failure.
On
a personal level, it can manifest as a general anxiety, or a body image
problem. On a community level, it can sabotage something as seemingly simple as
a blog (if you want proof of the mini me, just take note of the widespread
pettiness on social media). Globally, as manifested in the likes of Hillary
Clinton and Donald Trump, it is expressed as war, as economic and environmental
madness. This force has been given many names. I have heard it called “The
Gremlin,” or (for the fundamentalists here) “Satan.” I call it ego-based
living, or the “Mini Me.”
Unlike
the movie, we cannot see or measure the mini me directly; we only know it by
its effects. It is like a thief in the night: you actually do not see him, but
you know he has been there because your valuables have been taken. This mini me
is state of mind -- a social conditioning of sorts and it possesses certain
qualities:
Sense
of Lack This is the essence
of the mini me. Enough is never enough; we are never spiritual enough, skinny
enough, smart enough, or hip enough. We perceive everything through this sense
of lack. We can’t do the big things and must settle for less.
Sense
of Separation Constantly reaching
"out there" to fill up our sensed emptiness keeps us focused on a “me-oriented”
reality, reinforcing our separateness.
Addiction Gripped in the throes of craving and
lack, as soon as we sense that something external will “do it” for us, we latch
on to it and become addicted. In this way, the mini me can lead us into
unhealthy attachments to wring-headed and pernicious social policies, work,
sex, food, drugs, the internet, or even romantic relationships.
Fear Once desire and addition take over, we
are overcome by a sense of non-specific fear. If we believe the right politician
will alleviate our sense of emptiness, immediately loneliness becomes a
terrifying fate.
Suspicion fear makes us suspicious, we trust no
one completely.
Strategic
Living We always plan for
the worst -- something bad can happen any moment (politicians are notorious for
using this aspect of the mini me).
Anxiety There is the notion that something is
wrong, that we should be doing something more to be “complete.”
Hostile Competition this is especially
true in the realm of politics (and dating). If there is this notion that there
is not enough, we must fight others who are trying to get it too! This is
hostile competition as opposed to co-creation.
From
a political standpoint, how do we get back to a vision of a society where
ego-driven madness doesn’t rule? How do we (or do we want to?) get back to our collective
original self -- connected to something more powerful than mere desire,
aversion, and grasping? I do know this much: we don’t get it back by
participating and electing the same candidates and expecting different results.
My
name is Eddie and I’m in recovery from civilization…
No comments:
Post a Comment
What say you?