Hola mi Gente,
What I find interesting is Paul Krugman, an economics professor who won a Nobel Prize for his Keynesian economics, writing a series of articles attacking presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, for Sanders’ Keynesian economics and defending neoliberal Hillary Clinton -- this is your mainstream media at work.
What I find interesting is Paul Krugman, an economics professor who won a Nobel Prize for his Keynesian economics, writing a series of articles attacking presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders, for Sanders’ Keynesian economics and defending neoliberal Hillary Clinton -- this is your mainstream media at work.
* * *
Stages of moral reasoning |
Enlightened Service
People
say, “I want love.” Take out ego (“I”) and desire (“want”) and what are you left
with?
I
work in the non-profit/ industrial sector and at the heart of that work is the mission
is to work towards helping marginalized people to “empower themselves.” It’s a
serious responsibility cutting across all levels for those concerned. After my
own awakening, I made a decision to make service the centerpiece of my life’s
mission, and I realized that not all of my motivations were as pure as I would
like to think. There’s a dark side to service and I see it all the time, both
within myself, and in my colleagues.
In
Buddhism, there are different levels of generosity. At one level generosity
arises from the desire to amass spiritual “points” for the afterlife or at some
point out there somewhere. Some serve because they hope they will reap some
benefits. Others do service, and this very much prevalent, because it gives
them a sense of identity: “I’m a good person, see how I helped the helpless
little natives?” Others serve because religious dogma dictates they do. These
are the evangelicals who do service if you accept their God and beliefs. It may
not be overt, but this kind of giving is coercive or at least transactional: the
pressure to submit to their particular brand of dogma is there. There are many
reasons, both good and bad, for service.
I
think what’s as important as service is the motivation underlying the drive to
serve. For the most part, service is flavored by the stage
of moral development one is serving from. Service from the egocentric (I
care for myself) stage will look and feel much different from service from
a person who works from an ethnocentric (I care for my tribe, my country, my
nation) and that, in turn, will be different from a person who operates
from a worldcentric view (I care for all human beings, regardless of race,
color, sex, or creed). Service is a tool and wielded by the misguided can
do more harm than good. I can’t resist the cliché here that in the hands of a
murderer, a knife is a weapon, but in the hands of a doctor, it is a tool for
healing.
I’ll
attempt a clearer example: Let’s say you are at an ethnocentric stage of
development and you have a moment of awakening or spiritual experience of being
one with everything, you might interpret that as an experience of oneness with a
particular deity and conclude that no one can be saved unless they accept that deity
as their personal savior (this is the “ethnocentric interpretation – you must belong to this one group in order
to be saved). Have a spiritual experience at the ethnocentric stage and it
will only make you more ethnocentric
See
how it works? You can be at any stage of development, experience the same
life-changing event and you will interpret it according how you perceive the
world. Now, let me see if I can piece this all together. We all know examples
of reborn Christians who have had very powerful spiritual awakenings; they
glow, they are radiant, and they are often fascists. This is because they are
still at the ethnocentric stage, and, bless them, think Jesus is the one and
only way. But there is hope yet, research shows that the more spiritual
awakenings you experience, the more quickly you move through developmental
stages.
So,
what the fuck does this have to do with self-centeredness and service, you ask?
Well, the teachings of Jesus and others remain relevant today because of the
emphasis on service, what I consider a form of prayer in action. Basically, my
point is that it’s easy to utter prayers, doesn’t take much effort, really.
However, when our spiritual life is about getting something or arriving at some
destination, it reinforces the feeling of having a need -- of not being there
yet. Wanting anything, including a mate, or spiritual enlightenment, works to
solidify a universe in which you are missing what you want. It creates a
universe centered on you.
The
only cure for this endless and painful quest is service and gratitude, period.
LOL… Fucked up, huh? I mean I always thought it would be Halle Berry, but she’s
not returning my phone calls these days.
Here’s
one level of service as described the Buddhist literature (and echoed in many
religious disciplines): Enlightened service. Enlightened service only comes
about from doing the inner work to the point where it takes no effort. If you
put your finger in a flame, it takes no effort or willpower to pull it out. You
feel the pain, and the action is spontaneous. When your sense of self expands
to include other things and creatures aside from the sack of flesh you call
“you” and expand your circle of life, you feel those close to you as you would yourself.
When
a mother sees her child in danger, standing in the path of an oncoming car, for
example, she does not need religious dogma to know what to do. The intimacy she
feels with her child makes her action spontaneous. As our ego membrane becomes
thinner, and one recognizes that we are all connected somehow, all things
become more intimate, and our connection to them is stronger. Everyone becomes
a part of us -- one humanity. It is only then that we begin to embody Jesus’
teachings, or the Buddha’s, or Krishna’s too, and the teaching lives in us.
Service,
enlightened service, is the only true prayer.
My
name is Eddie and I’m in recovery from civilization…
No comments:
Post a Comment
What say you?