Hola mi Gente,
On August 6, 1945, in Hiroshima, Japan, the United States
dropped the first of two nuclear bombs, becoming the only country to ever use a weapon of mass destruction on civilians.
Recently, this incident has garnered some interest as President Obama, the
first US president to visit Hiroshima since the bombing, called for nuclear
disarmament. Despite his call for an end to nuclear weapons, the United States
has been quietly upgrading its nuclear arsenal to create smaller, more precise
nuclear bombs as part of a massive effort that will cost up to $1 trillion over
three decades.
I first came to know the truth about Hiroshima and
Nagasaki when I returned to school and discovered the Hiroshima Maidens…
Mutually Assured Destruction [MAD]
The central image of
this painting is a representation of The Tree of the Knowledge of Good and
Evil. The side panels are taken from displays in the Hiroshima Peace Museum
showing the aftermath of the nuclear bombing of that city.
The Hiroshima Maidens
was a group of twenty-five Japanese women who were horribly disfigured as young
women as a result of the atom bomb dropped on Hiroshima on the morning of
August 6, 1945. They dedicated their lives to telling the story of the
Hiroshima bombings and the horror of nuclear war.
My curiosity piqued after listening
to their talk while I was in college, I investigated further and what I
discovered wasn’t pretty, to say the least. The accepted rationale for
Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been that if the atomic bomb had not been dropped,
the war would have continued and more lives would have been lost. Nothing could
be further from the truth.
Many nations have tested nuclear
weapons, but only one has ever used them. That nation, of course, is the United
States; the bombs it dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August, 1945
incinerated more than 100,000 residents and left perhaps twice that number
dying slowly from radiation poisoning. However, politicians at the time and
conventional historians still maintain that those acts were justified. Short of
a full-scale invasion of Japan, its leaders would not have been convinced to
surrender, and that, the reasoning goes, would have resulted in an even higher
death toll.
How many lives would have been lost
in such an invasion is not clear. While President Truman threw around figures
from 500,000 - one million, at least one historian wrote that the figures the
military planners projected put the number at between 20,000-46,000. However,
the disturbing issue here is not the discrepancy in numbers, but the fact that
neither an invasion nor a nuclear attack was necessary to make Japan surrender.
By June 1945, whole-scale bombing
of Japan’s six largest cities had substantially wiped out Japan’s
infrastructure and countless lives. In March of that year, as many as one million Tokyo residents were left
homeless from the bombing raids. No oil shipments were getting into the
country, which was utterly dependent on foreign oil, and by late that July, 90
percent of Japanese merchant shipping had been destroyed.
While it is true that some Japanese
factions were resisting the notion of surrender, the leaders in charge were on
the verge of calling it quits. The only point deterring surrender was the
Japanese concern that the emperor would be allowed to maintain his title. The
US forces, of course, eventually accepted this condition.
A US government report issued in
1946 concluded that the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs did cause a Japanese
surrender. The report cited documentation that as early as May 1945, Japanese
leaders had decided that the war be ended even if it meant complete
acceptance of Allied terms. The document cites the conclusion that Japan would have surrendered even if the atomic bombs had not been dropped and even if no invasion had been planned or completed.
Another 1946 document, a recently
discovered secret intelligence study by the army’s top planning and operations
group, came to the same conclusion: an invasion “would not have been necessary”
and the A-bomb was not decisive in ending the war.
This view wasn’t some radical lefty
bullshit; key military leaders echoed it. “The Japanese were already defeated
and ready to surrender… In being the first to use [the atomic bomb] we had
adopted an ethical standard common to the barbarians of the Dark Ages,” said
William D. Leahy, who was the president’s Chief of Staff and the nation’s
senior military officer. The same opinion was offered
by Dwight D. Eisenhower and Winston Churchill. As you can see, these were
conservative people. Indeed, Fleet Admiral Chester W. Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the Pacific Fleet,
went public with this statement: “The Japanese had, in fact, already sued for
peace… The atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military
standpoint, in the defeat of Japan.”
This isn’t hindsight, as these
assessments were known by US policy makers before they chose to drop the bombs. In fact, in July,
American intelligence had intercepted a cable from Japanese foreign Minister
Shigenori Togo to his ambassador in Moscow that referred to “His Majesty’s
strong desire to secure a termination of the war… ”
There was no attempt on behalf of
the Truman administration to demand surrender. No show of power by, say,
dropping the bomb on an unpopulated island. There was no careful consideration.
This wasn’t the act of last resort. So, if there was no true imperative to drop
the bombs then why?
There are several theories, but the
one I adhere to is that the US was about enter an unprecedented position of
leadership in most of the post-war world and a demonstration of nuclear might
was intended more for the Soviets than anything else. It was a show of power to
the Soviets, a nation the US military feared. In fact, that the second bomb was
made from plutonium, and not uranium as the first one, suggests that the
Japanese people were the subject of a gruesome scientific experiment. The bombs
were more of an opening shot in a Cold War that would last for decades.
I write all this because we should
never forget. We all should know all those innocent men, women, and children
didn’t need to die, as those in power would have us believe.
My name is Eddie and I’m in
recovery from civilization…
Resources
Alperovitz, G. (1995) The decision
to use the atomic bomb and the architecture of an American myth. (New York:
Knopf) [link]
Zinn, H. (1991). A people's history
of the United States: 1492-present. New York: Perennial Classics. [link]
Loewen, J. W. (1995). Lies my
teacher told me: Everything your American history textbook got wrong New York:
Touchstone Books. [link]
No comments:
Post a Comment
What say you?