Hola
mi gente,
For the most part, I am taking a break from the news of the day. For one, I cannot stomach the likes of Rachel Maddow and the rest of the poseurs of the liberal punditry class and I refuse to read, listen to, or watch corporate media. I’ve had it.
For the most part, I am taking a break from the news of the day. For one, I cannot stomach the likes of Rachel Maddow and the rest of the poseurs of the liberal punditry class and I refuse to read, listen to, or watch corporate media. I’ve had it.
An eye for an eye will make
the whole world go blind.
-- “Mahatma” Mohandas Gandhi (1869-1948)
-- “Mahatma” Mohandas Gandhi (1869-1948)
Gandhi practiced ahimsa, a belief in
nonviolence as a way of life. He was assassinated, but not before he he became
part of a process that liberated 600 million from British dominion -- without
firing a shot. A teacher once told me the story that at the precise moment when
he came face-to-face with his murderer, Gandhi’s first instinct was to bow to
him in the spirit of forgiveness. Even when faced with his enemy -- his
killer -- his last gesture was an act of forgiveness.
Amazing...
As I attempt to write a piece for an organization seeking to
empower families and their currently and formerly incarcerated loved ones, I think
of Gandhi’s power of example. Gandhi was an influence on so many people
including Martin Luther King, Jr. Both men were able to reconcile conflicting
energies into sustained movements that changed the world. Both men met their
demise at the hands of murderous violence.
How seemingly opposite ideologies sometimes share the same
ethical/ spiritual concerns are captured brilliantly in Graham Greene’s
masterpiece, ThePower and the Glory. Greene captures it in what is essentially a
parable. The novel revolves around a revolutionary Marxist soldier who believes
that he must kill a Catholic priest, even though the priest is a harmless drunk
-- a “whiskey priest” -- because the priest represents a corrupt institution
that has been complicit in his, and his people’s, exploitation.
The priest is a fugitive from this revolutionary, making his
way among the peasants he once served, sleeping in their barns and fields. The
revolutionary, in his exercise of revolutionary self-righteousness, is so
thoroughly convinced of the necessity of the murder of the priest that he is willing
to kill his “own people,” the peasants, as hostages in order to get at the
priest.
But in the end, the drunken priest, representative of a
corrupt Church, and the idealistic revolutionary, who murders in the name of
self-righteousness, share the same spiritual values. The priest says to the
revolutionary just before the lieutenant empties his gun into his head, “You’re
a good man.” This is not merely a pitiful gesture of moral generosity. It is a
simple statement of recognition: I see what is in your heart, and it is good.
Tragically, in the fallen world in which they must act, neither can do anything
but work against his own deepest and most passionate beliefs. The irony being
that they conspire together in their different ways to defeat a shared
spiritual and ethical vision. Both the Church and the revolution are corrupt,
destructive, and murderous, but the desire for loving and just human relations
is nonetheless embedded deeply beneath their failed institutions.
We are at our most dangerous when we are fully convinced
that our positions are absolutely morally superior. Our biggest challenge is
that we must question why we are most uncomfortable with the hard questions and
why, in our rush to be certain, we kill one another.
My name is Eddie and I’m in recovery from civilization…
No comments:
Post a Comment
What say you?